Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 56
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1469
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: ASGOD BARRANTES, CHARLES M. GRAY and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Not Yet Classified: BECKY HURLEY MOCK, LOUIS M. DUKE, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Plaintiff: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, OCTAVIA RAINEY, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and others
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1474
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: ASGOD BARRANTES, BRIAN M. MILLER, EBONY N. WEST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SARA STOHLER, KAY BRANDON, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Louis M. Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 16-2193
Plaintiff: NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP, ROSANELL EATON, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff: CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS M. DUKE, JOSUE E. BERDUO, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of North Carolina, KIM WESTBROOK STRACH, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor/Defendant: CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL and JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED
In Re: Wayne Anderson
as 16-9632
Movant: In re: WAYNE ANDERSON, a/k/a G, a/k/a Goldie
:
Baker v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv05581
Plaintiff: Goldie Baker
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crady v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv05117
Plaintiff: Goldie Crady
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
League of Women Voters of NC v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1474
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff: LOUIS M. DUKE, CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and others
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Louis Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1469
Plaintiff: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff: CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS M. DUKE, JOSUE E. BERDUO, NANCY J. LUND and others
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Dinkel v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00970
Plaintiff: Goldie Dinkel
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schultz v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv10913
Plaintiff: Goldie Schultz
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?