Cases 11 - 20 of 188
Moss v. Younkin et al
as 7:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Glen Younkin, John S. Edwards, R. Creigh Deeds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Owens et al
as 7:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Owens, J. Harrison, M. Posaik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Squire et al
as 7:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Squire, Sgt. N. Bowman, R. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
David M. Whitfield
Defendant:
Sgt Artis, Ches. Jail Medical Staff, Sgt Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Reynolds et al
as 7:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Reynolds, S.K. Coleman, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Harrison et al
as 7:2023cv00218
Defendant:
H. Harr, J. Harrison, T. Lowe and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Ms. Avent, et al.
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Sidney N. Harrison
Defendant:
Ms. Avent, KM Williams, K. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 7:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Blankenship, T. Norvell, C.A. Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Norvell, C.A. Dye, Lt. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv01409
Plaintiff:
Sidney N. Harrison
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
