Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Mobley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00695
Plaintiff:
James Robert Mobley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Byrd v. Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
as 6:2016cv03494
Petitioner:
James Robert Byrd
Respondent:
Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2016cv01490
Plaintiff:
James Robert Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Byrd v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2015cv04518
Petitioner:
James Robert Byrd
Respondent:
Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillips 66 Company v. Quality Energy Services LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01765
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Company
Defendant:
Quality Energy Services LLC, Teresa Roberts, James Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parrish v. McDonald et al
as 6:2015cv01475
Plaintiff:
James Robert Parrish
Defendant:
Robert A McDonald and Leigh A Bradley
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Thomas v. Commissioner Social Security Administration et al
as 6:2012cv02002
Plaintiff:
James Robert Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Byrd v. Greenville County Sheriff Department et al
as 6:2012cv01038
Plaintiff:
James Robert Byrd
Defendant:
Greenville County Sheriff Department , J L Anderson , South Carolina Probation Parole and Pardon Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rozier v. Smith et al
as 8:2012cv00504
Plaintiff:
James Robert Rozier
Defendant:
Eddie Smith and Jimmy Boggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eubanks v. Hutchins et al
as 7:2011cv02097
Plaintiff:
James Robert Eubanks, Sr
Defendant:
Matt Hutchins and Spartanburg County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
