Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Scott v. Arents et al
as 1:2021cv00995
Plaintiff:
Gail Scott
Defendant:
Martine Arents, IM Investments LLC, DHI Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Ramey et al
as 7:2021cv00348
Defendant:
A. Duncan, Fleming, #1 Doe Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lassiter Jr v. Kuyaten et al
as 1:2019cv00968
Defendant:
S. Ivette Kuyaten, Neal Gay Shepherd and Ryan Matthew Shepherd
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lassiter Jr v. Kuyaten et al
as 1:2019cv00636
Defendant:
S Ivette Kuyaten, Ryan Matthew Shepherd and Neal Gray Crowder
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shepherd's Heart Anglican Church v. City of Fairfax et al
as 1:2017cv00947
Plaintiff:
Shepherd's Heart Anglican Church
Defendant:
City of Fairfax and Cathy Salgado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marilyn T. Thomas, Administrator of the Estate of Albert T. Thomas, Deceased v. Earl Baynor Jr Trucking, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00588
Defendant:
Earl Baynor Jr Trucking, Inc , Rodney V. Shepherd and Perdue Farms, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marilyn T. Thomas, Administrator of the Estate of Albert T. Thomas,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shepherd v. USA
as 1:2016cv00186
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Laura Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Makdessi v. McAuliffe et al
as 3:2014cv00214
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
Terry McAuliffe, Harvy Bryant, Katherine Orsini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
