Cases 221 - 230 of 436
Kenneth Rivera v. C. Long
as 13-6442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH RIVERA, a/k/a Kenneth Syncere Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT C. LONG, of SIU, SCDC HQ, SERGEANT JAMIE BELUE, C. O. M. GOLLACH and others
Addison et al v. SCDC et al
as 0:2013cv00744
Plaintiff:
Terrell Addison and Andre Richardson
Defendant:
SCDC, Albert L Mack, Monique Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Michael Perry v. SCDC
as 13-6402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TYRONE PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
SCDC, LEE CI, A. J. PADULA, Warden and others
Matthew Harris v. Willie Eagleton
as 13-6359
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW S. HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
MR. WILLIE L. EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution SCDC and SC ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kenneth Rivera v. William Byar
as 13-6271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH SYNCERE RIVERA, a/k/a Kenneth Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
AGENCY DIRECTOR WILLIAM R. BYARS, SCDC NUTRITIONIST MARCIA FULLER, EVELYN BARBER, Head Kitchen Supervisor and others
Al-Mujahidin v. Morton et al
as 9:2013cv00456
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Al-Mujahidin
Defendant:
Penny Morton, P Talbert, Leroy Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Christopher Williams v. Warden McKie
as 13-6141
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LOVE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN MCKIE
Respondent:
SCDC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00256
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rayvern Green v. A. Padula
as 13-6109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYVERN EARL GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
A. J. PADULA, Warden and JUDGE BYARS, SCDC Director
James Scott v. William Byar
as 13-6088
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES DARNELL SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM R. BYARS, SCDC Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
