Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Corrington v. Warden Armstead et al
as 8:2020cv02104
Defendant:
Medical Administrator, Lt. Reed, Warden Armstead and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Corrington
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hatchett v. Nines et al
as 8:2020cv02059
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Assistant Warden Jeff Nines
Petitioner:
Timothy Earl Hatchett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Levy v. Hogan et al
as 8:2020cv01905
Defendant:
Dr. Lynda Bonieskie, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Chief Orlando Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Shawnte Anne Levy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Corporal v. Assistant Warden Butler et al
as 8:2020cv01809
Defendant:
Secretary R. Green, C.M. Jeffcoat, C.M. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Corporal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dove v. Gang
as 8:2020cv01145
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Dove
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Allen Gang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harvey v. Nines
as 8:2020cv00803
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Jeff Nines
Petitioner:
Jermile Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hutton v. Hickman et al
as 1:2019cv03665
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Hutton
Defendant:
Warden Louis Hickman and Assistant Warden James Balderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hall et al v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2019cv03005
Defendant:
Ast. Warden Keith L. Lyons, Dean Vosburgh, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Plaintiff:
Owen Hall, Lillith D'Eustachio, Loretta Lynn Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crisantos v. Moubarek et al
as 1:2019cv02932
Defendant:
Warden J. R. Bell, Shobe, Felix and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Crisantos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bowen v. W.C.I. Medical et al
as 1:2019cv02778
Defendant:
W.C.I. Correctional Officers, J.C.I. Adminstration, W.C.I. Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
