Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Johnson v. Sterling et al
as 2:2019cv00115
Defendant:
Rudy Tisdale, Michael McCall, Ms Cappadonia and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
King v. Montouth et al
as 0:2018cv02856
Defendant:
Aurther Burton, Brian Sterling, M. E. Montouth and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. King and Curtis Lamar King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sterling et al
as 4:2018cv02368
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Brian Sterling and Charles Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roderick English v. Cpt. Livingstone
as 17-7142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK JEROME ENGLISH
Defendant - Appellee:
CPT. LIVINGSTONE, SGT. WALKER, WARDEN LEWIS and others
Jenkins v. SC Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv01932
Plaintiff:
Bobby C Jenkins
Defendant:
SC Department of Corrections , Brian Sterling , Willie Eagleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dustin Williamson v. Brian Sterling
as 17-6922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUSTIN ROBERT WILLIAMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN STERLING, DELORIS CHARLTON, ED CARROLL and others
Defendant:
JANE OR JOHN DOE, at Solicitors office in Barnwell, South Carolina, in individual capacity
English v. Livingstone et al
as 1:2016cv02985
Plaintiff:
Roderick Jerome English
Defendant:
Cpt. Livingstone, Sgt. Walker, Warden Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv01069
Plaintiff:
Sammy Keith Watkins
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Brian Sterling, Michael McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Sterling et al
as 9:2016cv00895
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gonzalez
Defendant:
Brian Sterling and Michael Stobbe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Sterling
as 6:2016cv00478
Plaintiff:
Marcus L Watts
Defendant:
Brian Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
