Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Floyd Powell v. Tony Keller
as 09-8172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY A. KELLER, JORGE SOSA, JASON COY REID and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Floyd Powell v. Tony Keller
as 09-6272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY A. KELLER, JORGE SOSA, JASON COY REID and others
C. F. Cloninger Trucking II, Inc. v. SourceOne Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00320
Plaintiff:
C. F. Cloninger Trucking II, Inc.
Defendant:
SourceOne Group, Inc., SourceOne, Inc. and Dalrada Financial Corporation, f/k/a Imaging Technologies Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Walter Sadler v. US
as 08-1731
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER LEE SADLER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Western District of North Carolina, GRETCHEN C. F. SHAPPERT, U.S. Attorney, Western District North Carolina and others
Floyd Powell v. Lieutenant Tony A. Keller
as 07-7780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY A. KELLER, JORGE SOSA, JASON COY REID and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.