Cases 21 - 30 of 55
David Meyers v. J. Bentley
as 19-6917
Defendant / Appellee:
FL. OFFICER LEWIS, HENRY PONTON, SERGEANT MEADE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Gary Wall v. N. Stevens
as 19-6484
Defendant / Appellee:
A. O'QUINN, N. STEVENS, Correctional Officer of ROSP, A. VAUGHAN, Correctional Officer of ROSP and others
Defendant:
BARKSDALE, Warden of ROSP and S. SHORTRIDGE, Operations Manager/"Active" PREA Manager of ROSP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY WALL
David Meyers v. Walter Swiney
as 19-6217
Defendant:
M. L. COUNTS, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, C. COMBS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
D. C. STALLARD and WALTER SWINEY, Unit Manager
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Bentley
as 19-6177
Defendant / Appellee:
FL. OFFICER LEWIS, HENRY PONTON, SERGEANT MEADE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. US District Ct, Big Stone Gap
as 19-6173
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY PONTON, J. H. MIDDLETON, J.B. MESSER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00472
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00337
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00075
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
John Donohue v. J. Lambert
as 16-6628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PATRICK DONOHUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. J. LAMBERT, LT. MCCOWAN, LT. LIEUTENANT PAYNE and others
Defendant:
LT. SERGEANT BLEVENS, WARDEN RANDALL C. MATHENA, C/O OFFICER BEVERLY and others
Lameek Johns v. D. Farmer
as 15-6649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMEEK SHALAM JOHNS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORPORAL DEEL, ROSP Correctional Officer, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SMITH, ROSP Correctional Officer, J B. HALL, ROSP Sergeant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.