Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Cherry v. Greer et al
as 1:2015cv01706
Defendant:
Wyne Greer, Veronica and Todd Godwin
Plaintiff:
Travis Lavon Cherry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry v. Greer et al
as 1:2015cv01588
Plaintiff:
Travis Lavon Cherry
Defendant:
Wyne Greer, Todd Godwin and Levy Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. et al
as 3:2015cv00387
Plaintiff:
Eve M. Davis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. , Brenda Greer , James V. Harney, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Greer v. B & M and King George Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00767
Plaintiff:
Steven Greer
Defendant:
Roger Moore and B & M and King George Auto Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cherry v. Holcomb et al
as 1:2014cv01148
Plaintiff:
Tommie Cherry
Defendant:
Holcomb, Jamison, Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephenson v. Diggs et al
as 1:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
Javon Marqus Stephenson
Defendant:
Z. Diggs, Kathy Vargas, Gary Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Stephenson v. Bryan et al
as 1:2013cv00541
Plaintiff:
Javon Marqus Stephenson
Defendant:
P. Bryan, Kathy Vargas, G. Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greer v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail-Abingdon
as 7:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jacky Lynn Greer, Jr.
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail-Abingdon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2012cv00710
Plaintiff:
Donald Davenport , Montague Agee , Michael Alston and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
