Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Camp v. Richmond Courts Thirteenth Judicial District Judge David Eugene Cheek, Sr. et al
as 2:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Walter Claude Camp
Defendant:
Richmond Courts Thirteenth Judicial District Judge David Eugene Cheek, Sr. and Ann Camble-Baskerville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pcelinski v. Kellum et al
as 1:2009cv01323
Plaintiff:
Mario G. Pcelinski
Defendant:
Dr. Kellum, Dr. Clarke, Alton Baskerville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bell v. Baskerville
as 1:2009cv01155
Petitioner:
Christopher Juan Bell
Respondent:
Alton Baskerville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Maurice et al
as 2:2009cv00396
Plaintiff:
Imel Original Peterson
Defendant:
R. Maurice, R. Edwards and Alton Baskerville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Ponton et al
as 1:2009cv00694
Plaintiff:
Bryant Campbell
Defendant:
Henry J. Ponton, R. Hairss and Medical Staff of Baskerville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv00573
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, G. K. Washington, Charlene Davis and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Bonham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baskerville v. Commonwealth Of Virginia
as 2:2009cv00176
Petitioner:
Ebony Daschion Baskerville
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Greene v. Phipps et al
as 7:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Joseph Donald Greene
Defendant:
James Phipps, Bradley Finch, Joshai Showalter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henry v. Baskerville et al
as 3:2008cv00561
Plaintiff:
Christopher Henry
Defendant:
Al Baskerville and Unknown
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
