Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MITSUI SUMITOMO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. AUTOMATIC ELEVATOR COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00480
Plaintiff:
MITSUI SUMITOMO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AUTOMATIC ELEVATOR COMPANY, INC. and DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DUKE UNIVERSITY et al v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA
as 1:2008cv00854
Plaintiff:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Med-Trans Corporation v. Robert Fitzgerald
as 08-2296
Appellant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL, THE CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, d/b/a Carolinas Medical Center and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MED-TRANS CORPORATION
Defendant - None:
ROBERT J. FITZGERALD, Director, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity, LEE B. HOFFMAN, Chief, Certificate of Need Section, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity, DREXDAL R. PRATT, Chief, Office of Emergency Medical Services, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and others
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. v. STERIS CORPORATION
as 1:2008cv00848
Plaintiff:
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Defendant:
STERIS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Med-Trans Corporation v. Robert Fitzgerald
as 08-2238
Appellant:
NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, THE CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, d/b/a Carolinas Medical Center and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MED-TRANS CORPORATION
Defendant - None:
ROBERT J. FITZGERALD, Director, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity, LEE B. HOFFMAN, Chief, Certificate of Need Section, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity, DREXDAL R. PRATT, Chief, Office of Emergency Medical Services, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and others
Med-Trans Corporation v. Dempsey Benton
as 08-1952
Appellant:
THE CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, d/b/a Carolinas Medical Center, MISSION HOSPITALS, INCORPORATED, NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MED-TRANS CORPORATION
Defendant - None:
DEMPSEY BENTON, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity, ROBERT J. FITZGERALD, Director, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity, LEE B. HOFFMAN, Chief, Certificate of Need Section, Division of Facility Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity and others
DUKE UNIVERSITY et al v. MASSEY ENERGY CO. et al
as 1:2008cv00591
Plaintiff:
DUKE UNIVERSITY and DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Defendant:
MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY and MASSEY COAL SALES CO., INC. D/B/A MASSEY INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Godwin v. HMSHost Corporation Medical Plan et al
as 5:2008cv00383
Plaintiff:
Joyce Godwin
Defendant:
HMSHost Corporation Medical Plan, Duke University Health System, Inc., WAKE ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
