Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv03228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reid-Bowser v. Dukes et al
as 1:2011cv03228
Plaintiff:
Tayrn Reid-Bowser
Defendant:
Charlene Dukes, Prince Georges Community College Board of Trustees and Prince Georges Community College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv03119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cam Construction Company, Inc. v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners of the Baltimore City Public School System et al
as 1:2011cv02359
Plaintiff:
Cam Construction Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners of the Baltimore City Public School System , Baltimore City Department of Education , Andres A. Alonso and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Roy Kirby & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Halim v. Duke et al
as 1:2011cv02265
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Halim
Defendant:
Neil E. Duke and Andres Alonso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dukes v. The State of Maryland et al
as 1:2011cv00876
Plaintiff:
Damon Dukes
Defendant:
The State of Maryland, The Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, Alexander Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv02196
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01817
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
