Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 155
Goldstein v. Trammell et al
as 8:2018cv02429
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, Henrico County Chief Police, Officer D. Trammell and others
Plaintiff: David Scott Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Goldstein v. Martin Cetron et al
as 8:2018cv02400
Defendant: US Marshalls-SD, Avera McKinron, Columbia Corrective Care and others
Plaintiff: David Scott Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02376
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2 Job Discrimination
Goldstein v. Cohen et al
as 8:2018cv02260
Plaintiff: David Scott Goldstein
Defendant: Judge Alexander and Suzanne Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kent v. Triangle Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv02137
Plaintiff: Michael Kent
Defendant: W. McComb Dunwoody, Benjamin S. Goldstein, Steven C. Lilly and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Hammer v. Triangle Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv02086
Plaintiff: Craig Hammer
Defendant: W. McComb Dunwoody, Simon B. Rich, Benjamin S. Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlson v Triangle Capital Corporation, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00332
Defendant: W. McComb Dunwoody, Benjamin S. Goldstein, Steven C. Lilly and others
Plaintiff: Dan Carlson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goldstein v. Joyce
as 8:2018cv02028
Plaintiff: David S. Goldstein
Defendant: Jerome Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Goldstein v. Marshall
as 8:2018cv02092
Defendant: Judge John Marshall
Plaintiff: David Scott Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Goldstein v. Barnes. et al
as 8:2018cv02093
Defendant: Director A Watts, Officer Olds, Dr. Barnes and others
Plaintiff: David Scott Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?