Cases 31 - 40 of 238
REID et al v. ANDREWS
as 1:2022cv00880
Plaintiff:
Larry Reid, Larry Reid Live, LLC and LARRY D. REID
Defendant:
LaVontraye Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Moore v. Craven County et al
as 5:2022ct03360
Plaintiff:
Sharif Hakim Moore
Defendant:
Craven County, Jones County, City of New Bern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Reid et al
as 3:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Larry Brandon Moore
Defendant:
David Reid, Willis Fowler, J. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Sigmon
as 5:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Austin Reid Pittman
Defendant:
FNU Sigmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friedlam Partners, LLC v. Lerner and Company Real Estate et al
as 3:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
FRIEDLAM PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant:
LERNER AND COMPANY REAL ESTATE, BRENTWOOD ARMS APARTMENTS, LLC, DELANE GLEN APARTMENTS, LLC and others
Scott v. Harven A. Crouse Detention Center et al
as 5:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Dustin Gene Scott
Defendant:
Harven A. Crouse Detention Center, Bill Beam, Vida Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lentz v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Shelby Reid Lentz
Defendant:
FNU Honeycutt, FNU Dye and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff El v. Pierce et al
as 5:2022ct03238
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Pierce, Major Thaxton, Capt. Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REID v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 1:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FREDRIC REID
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rogers v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022ct03178
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lide Rogers
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Warden Morris G. Reid and Dr. Brian B. Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
