Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01465
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
by and through next friend G.C.P. v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 8:2019cv01943
Plaintiff:
J.O.P. by and through next friend G.C.P.
Defendant:
M.E.R.E., USCIS, K.A.R.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Melvin Urrutia v. William Barr
as 19-1608
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security
Petitioner:
MELVIN VLADIMIR URRUTIA, a/k/a Melvin UrruitIa
Sanchez et al v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2019cv01728
Plaintiff:
Alyse Sanchez and Elmer Onan Sanchez Hernandez
Defendant:
Acting Dir. ICE Matthew ALBENCE, Acting DHS Sec Kevin K. McAleenan and Field Off. Director Diane Witte
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Abdelhaleem Ashqar v. Russell Hott
as 19-6804
Respondent / Appellee:
RUSSELL HOTT, Field Office Director, Washington Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM P. BARR, in his official capacity as Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ABDELHALEEM ASHQAR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01433
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
