Cases 41 - 50 of 176
Bianco v. Rigeland CI et al
as 0:2018cv01870
Plaintiff:
Bradley Aaron Bianco
Defendant:
Bryan Sterling, Dr. Tran, Levern Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Woods et al
as 9:2018cv01514
Plaintiff:
Yashawnus Patterson
Defendant:
Yvonne Woods, Levern Cohen and Kenneth Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Young v. Levern Cohen
as 18-6331
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
LEVERN COHEN, Warden Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Matthew Jamison v. Levern Cohen
as 17-7466
Petitioner - Appellee:
MATTHEW JAMISON
Respondent - Appellant:
LEVERN COHEN
Respondent:
BRYAN P. STIRLING
Kough et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2017cv02938
Plaintiff:
Richard Kough , Brian Littlejohn , Craig Priester and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Levern Cohen , Officer Major and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rhoden v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 4:2017cv02537
Plaintiff:
Odis Rhoden
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Young v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2017cv01897
Petitioner:
Timothy Young
Respondent:
Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Cohen et al
as 0:2017cv01852
Plaintiff:
Antonio J. Richardson
Defendant:
Levern Cohen, Renee Evans, T. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. McCall et al
as 1:2017cv01456
Plaintiff:
Laurie Thomas
Defendant:
Michael McCall and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Manigault v. Albert Housey
as 17-6634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MANIGAULT
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBERT HOUSEY, Lieutenant
Defendant:
RYAN GRANT, Corporal, DUSTIN CROSBY, Officer, GARY EICHELBERGER, Major and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.