Cases 41 - 50 of 197
Hallman v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00297
Petitioner:
Sharif Hallman
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelley v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00295
Petitioner:
Christopher Kelly and Christopher Kelley
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hall v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00291
Petitioner:
Marc Pierre Hall
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ricardo Reyes v. Warden S. Lovett
as 23-6862
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICARDO REYES
Respondent / Appellee:
STANLEY LOVETT, JR.
Brown v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00198
Petitioner:
Aquilla Brown
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Green v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00197
Petitioner:
Berry Green
Respondent:
Mr Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hudson v. Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2023ct03246
Plaintiff:
Monte Lovette Hudson
Defendant:
Department of Adult Correction, Alexander Correctional Officers, Alexander Correctional Institution Staff (Intake) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dobbs v. Lovette
as 5:2023cv00268
Petitioner:
Kasper Lamar Dobbs
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sisk v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00182
Petitioner:
Stephen Lee Sisk
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Russell v. Designation and Sentence Computation Center (DSCC) et al
as 3:2023cv00166
Petitioner:
John Michael Russell
Respondent:
Designation and Sentence Computation Center (DSCC) and Warden Mr. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
