Cases 41 - 50 of 814
Pevia v. Warden of North Branch Corr Institute et al
as 1:2020cv03405
Petitioner:
Donald R. Pevia
Respondent:
Warden of North Branch Corr Institute and Attorney General for the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. State of Maryland
as 8:2020cv03408
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lewis and Johnathan Lewis
Respondent:
State of Maryland, Warden and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Graham Schiff v. Warden
as 20-7559
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Petitioner / Appellant:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Harris v. Quay et al
as 8:2020cv02894
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Maryland and WARDEN QUAY
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH S. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Clifton T. Perkins et al
as 1:2020cv02676
Respondent:
The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland and Clifton T. Perkins
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pair v. Nines et al
as 1:2020cv02448
Respondent:
The Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Jeff Niner and Jeff Nines
Petitioner:
Percy E. Pair, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Jackson-El v. Richard Dovey
as 20-7059
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL JACKSON-EL
Respondent / Appellee:
RICHARD DOVEY, Warden and BRIAN E. FROSH, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Benjamin Vance v. Frank Bishop, Jr.
as 20-6970
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENJAMIN E. VANCE
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND and WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.
Matthew Horner v. Jeffery Nines
as 20-6426
Petitioner:
MATTHEW JAMES HORNER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden and JEFFERY NINES, Acting Warden
Andrew Dicks v. Attorney General of Maryland
as 20-6352
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN CASEY CAMPBELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW JOSEPH DICKS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.