Cases 51 - 60 of 1,105
Dobson v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dobson
Defendant:
Rick White, K. Fleming, Michael Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Crawford
as 3:2023cv00582
Petitioner:
Andre Anthony Reid
Respondent:
Jeffrey Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Detrick et al v. City of Portsmouth et al
as 2:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Kurt Detrick, Thomas L. Sessoms, Anthony Malatesta and others
Defendant:
Mimi Terry, City of Portsmouth, Nestor Mangubat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Chesterfield VA Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Roy Mandell Smith
Defendant:
Chesterfield VA Sheriff Department, Kevin Connolly, Aaron Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Brett v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Jill Biden, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brett v. Biden et al
as 1:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Jill Biden, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Parker v. Duncan
as 2:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Tyler Parker
Defendant:
Anthony Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Santos v. The State of Virginia
as 2:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Erick Anthony Santos
Respondent:
The State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
