Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Messer v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2011cv00079
Plaintiff: Raymond Charles Messer
Defendant: Jim Rubenstein, Adrian Hoke and Debbie Cottrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2011cv00159
Plaintiff: Arthur Allen
Defendant: Jim Rubenstein, Adrian Hoke, William Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slie v. Hoke et al
as 5:2011cv00121
Petitioner: Robert Slie
Respondent: Adrian Hoke and Mark A. Karl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moran et al v. City of Fairmont et al
as 1:2011cv00121
Plaintiff: Kelley Moran , Gil Campbell , Steve Shine and others
Defendant: City of Fairmont and Jay Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pomales v. Hoke
as 2:2011cv00321
Petitioner: Archie T. Pomales
Respondent: Adrian Hoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Winning v. Hoke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00094
Plaintiff: Richard E. Winning
Defendant: Adrian F. Hoke, Tom Chenoweth, Debbie Contral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hess v. Hoke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00192
Plaintiff: Steve Hess
Defendant: Adrian Hoke, David Proctor, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ojeda v. Procter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00126
Plaintiff: Jonathan Ojeda
Defendant: Dr. Procter, Tristen Tenny, Adrian Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Proctor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00085
Plaintiff: William Wiley
Defendant: David Proctor, Tristan Tenney, Wexford Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Decker v. Hoke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00080
Petitioner: Robert Wayne Decker
Respondent: Adrian Hoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?