Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 5,502
Santos v. South Carolina, The State of
as 6:2024cv01712
Plaintiff: Eliseo Santos
Defendant: South Carolina, The State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Roberts, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2024cv01720
Plaintiff: Emory W. Roberts, Jr.
Defendant: State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv01686
Plaintiff: Roy Lee Wade
Defendant: State of South Carolina, Department of Mental Health, Kelly Gothard and others
Respondent: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1283
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Newberry v. South Carolina, State of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01678
Petitioner: Phillip D. Newberry
Respondent: South Carolina, State of and South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Kirkland Corr. Ins/ State of South Carolina
as 0:2024cv01674
Petitioner: Jerome Curry and (Flesh And Blood Man)
Respondent: Kirkland Corr. Ins/ South Carolina, State of and Warden, Kirkland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bedford v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024cv01680
Petitioner: Emanual Aurmond Bedford
Respondent: State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2024cv01623
Petitioner: Mickey Markell Johnson
Respondent: South Carolina, State of and Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products
as 24-1270
Not Yet Classified: In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, CORTEVA INC., DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., New DuPont and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01530
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?