Cases 61 - 70 of 108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015ct03247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosby v. Sykes et al
as 5:2015ct03202
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mosby
Defendant:
Eric Sykes, Steve Lenaier, Chris Sasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hewett v. Barnes et al
as 5:2015ct03185
Plaintiff:
Rocky L. Hewett, Sr.
Defendant:
Heather Melisa Barnes, Tasha Sharron, Alice Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Brunswick County Jail et al
as 5:2015ct03186
Plaintiff:
Eric Edward Bryant
Defendant:
Brunswick County Jail, McDaniel Supply Company and Ashley Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. A permanent easement totaling 0.799 acres, more or less, and temporary easements totaling 0.763 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 27.00 acres in et al
as 3:2014cv00407
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
A permanent easement totaling 0.799 acres, more or less, and temporary easements totaling 0.763 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 27.00 acres in, Roy L. Pittman, Margaret V. Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. Temporary easements totaling 0.119 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 12.00 acres in size, as more particularly described herein et al
as 3:2014cv00409
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
Temporary easements totaling 0.119 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 12.00 acres in size, as more particularly described herein, Cynthia P. Blalock, Constance Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. Permanent easement totaling 2.322 acres, more or less, and temporary easements totaling 3.209 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 83.00 acres in et al
as 3:2014cv00400
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
Permanent easement totaling 2.322 acres, more or less, and temporary easements totaling 3.209 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 83.00 acres in, Celeste Yvonne James, Sylvia Laverne (James) Shields and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. A permanent easement totaling 0.113 acres, more or less, and temporary easements totaling 0.130 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 4.20 acres in et al
as 3:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
A permanent easement totaling 0.113 acres, more or less, and temporary easements totaling 0.130 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 4.20 acres in, Cynthia Williams, Denise Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. A permanent easement totaling 0.889 acres, more or less, and temporary easements totaling 0.859 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 25.00 acres in et al
as 3:2014cv00405
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
A permanent easement totaling 0.889 acres, more or less, and temporary easements totaling 0.859 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 25.00 acres in, Jacqueline Roach Yarrell, Marion Roach Nesby and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
