Cases 71 - 80 of 164
Roger Ervin v. Corizon Health
as 21-7758
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER LEN ERVIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR WILLIAM BEEMAN, HOLLY PIERCE, RN Practitioner and others
Stuckey v. Ledjo et al
as 1:2021cv03203
Plaintiff:
Dante' Stuckey
Defendant:
NP Yvette Ledjo, NP Munjanja Y Litell, Dr. Tewodros B Teferra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bryant Davidson v. Luka Getnet
as 21-7663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYANT ELLIOTT DAVIDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LUKA GETNET, Regional Medical Director, FASIL WUBU, Medical Director at CBF, CORIZON HEALTH, INCORPORATED and others
Bryant Davidson v. Thomas Maronte, Jr.
as 21-7665
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYANT ELLIOTT DAVIDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY THOMAS MARONTE, JR., OFFICER MARTIN, SERGEANT FOCHMAN and others
Bassette v. Corizon Health
as 1:2021cv01279
Plaintiff:
Davonn A.W Bassette, Sr
Defendant:
Corizon Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bassette v. Corizon Health
as 1:2021cv01264
Plaintiff:
Davonn A.W Bassette, Sr
Defendant:
Corizon Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Warden Bivens et al
as 1:2021cv02934
Plaintiff:
Wayne Arthur Jordan
Defendant:
Warden Bivens, Warden Weber, Dr. Choudry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ervin v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2021cv02386
Plaintiff:
Roger Ervin
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Assistant Director William Beeman, Holly Pierce and others
Interested Party:
Division of Correction and Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rodgers v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2021cv02368
Plaintiff:
Arthur Rodgers
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Holly Hoover, Bill Beeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Aytch, Jr, v. Corizon Health, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02287
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Aytch, Jr,
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc. and Dr. Vivian Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
