Cases 71 - 80 of 1,389
Jonathan Riches v. Tsutomu Shimomura
as 08-7984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
TSUTOMU SHIMOMURA and JOHN MARKOFF
Jonathan Riches v. Akhil Bansal
as 08-7978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
AKHIL BANSAL and JERRY MCSPADDEN
Jonathan Riches v. Urban Outfitters Incorporated
as 08-7981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
URBAN OUTFITTERS INCORPORATED, THE WARNACO GROUP INCORPORATED, FCI WILLIAMSBURG and others
Jonathan Riches v. Investors Business Daily Incor
as 08-7980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY INCORPORATED, DATA ANALYSIS INCORPORATED, SCOTT STODDARD and others
Jonathan Riches v. Philip Woolston
as 08-7983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILIP WOOLSTON, Individually and in his official capacity as Teacher at FCI Williamsburg, STEVE JOBS and APPLE COMPUTER INC.
Jonathan Riches v. Clifford Stoll
as 08-7989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
CLIFFORD STOLL and MATTHEW R. SCHUSTER
Jonathan Riches v. Thomas Lamb
as 08-7965
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS P. LAMB and WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg
Jonathan Riches v. Marshall Safir
as 08-7967
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
MARSHALL P. SAFIR and WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg
Jonathan Riches v. Harold Haimowitz
as 08-7972
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD HAIMOWITZ, WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Jonathan Riches v. Michael Thevis
as 08-7968
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL G. THEVIS, BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
