Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,901
Nickens v. Gullett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv00615
Plaintiff: William Lee Nickens
Defendant: Lt. Gullett and Duffield Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tighe v. Yanes
as 7:2023cv00611
Plaintiff: Tara Lee Tighe
Defendant: Wilson Cabrera Yanes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Davis v. Dental Department II Building
as 1:2023cv01282
Plaintiff: Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant: Dental Department II Building
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Davis v. Pandya
as 1:2023cv01281
Plaintiff: Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant: Asha S. Pandya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff: Tra-Mel D. Lee
Defendant: Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bowman v. River North Prison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv00591
Plaintiff: David Lee Bowman
Defendant: River North Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Keller et al
as 7:2023cv00593
Plaintiff: Richard Brandon Davis
Defendant: Major C. Keller, Major D. Stokes, Captain Booer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Norfolk Police Department
as 1:2023cv01249
Plaintiff: Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant: Norfolk Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. Cheatam
as 2:2023cv00447
Petitioner: Kevin Lee Gregory
Respondent: Mr. Carlton, District Attorney of Stafford County and Roy Cheatam, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Carrow
as 1:2023cv01248
Plaintiff: Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant: William O. Carrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?