Cases 71 - 80 of 90
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00467
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Idris v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00136
Plaintiff:
Abdullatif Osman Idris
Defendant:
Susan P. Dibbins, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00395
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Diab v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00114
Petitioner:
Tawfiq Abu Diab
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ali v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
Shahzad Ali
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Aliens: Refusal of Citizenship
Van Der Reit et al v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv00055
Plaintiff:
John Marius Van Der Reit and Karen Van Der Reit
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Aliens: Refusal of Citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
