Cases 81 - 90 of 140,644
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ruth Henderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rolens et al v. Tug Hill Operating, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rolens and Kimberly Rolens
Defendant:
Tug Hill Operating, LLC, EQT Corporation and Enerstar Rentals and Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cook et al v. Hull Property Group, LLC
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tiffany N. Cook and Jason D. Cook
Defendant:
Hull Property Group, LLC a Georgia LLC doing business as Charleston Town Center Mall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Su v. Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
as 2:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. $11,123.00 from Moneygram International, Inc., Money Orders
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$11,123.00 From Moneygram International, Inc., Money Orders
General Insurance Company of America v. Bossio
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
General Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Bernard Bossio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hernandez v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Marco Hernandez
Defendant:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ali v. Lumico Life Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Keith Ali
Defendant:
Lumico Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Miller v. USA
as 5:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Kamron Eugene Miller, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
