Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Schultz v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Kamina Helene Schultz and Kamina H. Schultz
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
John Schultz v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv01368
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
John Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Schultz v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Barry Schultz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Simpson v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00396
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simpson, Tracy Alan Read, Lakeshia Reaggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Schultz v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv07147
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Schultz et al v. Komori America Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv03001
Plaintiff:
Gerald Schultz and Pamela Schultz
Defendant:
Komori America Corporation and Komori Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
AssuredPartners of South Carolina LLC et al v. Alliant Insurance Services Inc et al
as 3:2023cv04751
Plaintiff:
AssuredPartners of South Carolina LLC and AssuredPartners Capital Inc
Defendant:
Alliant Insurance Services Inc, Richard H Lonneman, Jr, Meghan Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FTC v. Andris Pukke
as 23-1742
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDRIS PUKKE, a/k/a Marc Romeo, a/k/a Andy Storm, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco, PETER BAKER, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco Futures Development, Eco Futures Bel and JOHN USHER, individually and as an officer or owner of Sittee River Wildlife Reserve (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and The Reserve) and Eco-Futures Belize Limited (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and
Defendant:
ECO-FUTURES BELIZE LIMITED, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a California Corporation, ECO FUTURES DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a company organized under the laws of Belize, BUY BELIZE, LLC, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, d/b/a Kanantik, d/b/a Laguna Palms, d/b/a Bamboo Springs, a California limited liability company and others
Respondent:
CROSS-FREDERICK ASSOCIATES, LLC and FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
THE HAMPSHIRE GENERATIONAL FUND LLC, DAVID PORTMAN, JULIE SANTOS and others
Trustee:
CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE
Receiver:
MARC-PHILIP FERZAN
Colleen Schultz v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03184
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02839
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Harold Edward Robertson, Robert Charles Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
