Cases 1 - 10 of 586
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al - DO NOT FILE ANY DOCUMENTS IN THIS CASE. ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE DOCKETED IN 5:24-CT-3139-FL.
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Bennett, Theodore Benjamin Lee, Anthony Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al
as 5:2024ct03139
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Bennett, Theodore Benjamin Lee, Anthony Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Truner et al
as 5:2024ct03132
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall
Defendant:
Sgt. Truner and Lt. Cribbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Norwood et al
as 5:2024ct03089
Plaintiff:
Shurod Rankin
Defendant:
Lieutenant Norwood, Sergeant P. Fobbs and Major Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Donnell E Adams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
