Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Fletcher v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turley v. City of South Charleston et al
as 2:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Jamie Brian Turley
Defendant:
The City of South Charleston, Justin Bailes, Aaron Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Hart et al
as 2:2018cv00905
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Abbie Hart, Kristina Butler, Elizabeth Bailes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11068
Plaintiff:
Ethel Inez Bailes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv06671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bailes v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv08079
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Wayne Bailes
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailes v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv24584
Plaintiff:
Terri Lea Bailes
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailes v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv18041
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Bailes
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv13233
Plaintiff:
Frances Bailes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
