Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Waymer v. Columbia Insurance Company et al
as 2:2019cv00260
Defendant:
James C Greene Company, O W Ray and Columbia Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kamil Waymer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Shulkin
as 2:2018cv00788
Plaintiff:
Claretta C Green
Defendant:
David J Shulkin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Green v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston et al
as 6:2017cv01235
Plaintiff:
Kimberly C Green
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston and Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Thomas et al v. Cypress Insurance Company et al
as 0:2017cv00802
Plaintiff:
William Mac Thomas and Mac Thomas Trucking
Defendant:
Cypress Insurance Company , James C. Green Company and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2010cv00170
Petitioner:
Ronnie C Green
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, Henry McMaster, Attorney General, State of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray et al v. South Carolina State Election Commission et al
as 3:2009cv02126
Plaintiff:
Kevin Alexander Gray, Glen Davis, Cassandra Fralix and others
Defendant:
South Carolina State Election Commission, John H Hudgens, Cynthia M Bensch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 - Voting Rights Act of 1965
South Carolina Green Party et al v. South Carolina State Election Commission et al
as 3:2008cv02790
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Green Party, Eugene Platt and Robert Dunham
Defendant:
South Carolina State Election Commission, John H Hudgens, Cynthia M Bensch and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00493
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
