Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Noel Thomas v. North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance Company
as 23-2168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOEL VINCENT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, NCMLIC, MICHAEL L. LAWRENCE, NCMLIC CEO, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, ALDOI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
US v. Manuel Del Cid Bran
as 22-4370
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL DE JESUS DEL CID BRAN
Cochenour v. Del Cid Orellana
as 1:2022cv01210
Plaintiff:
Abigail Cochenour
Defendant:
Armando Del Cid Orellana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bradley D. McMartin et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv01143
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., Amerex Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley D McMartin, Walter Maddocks, Rodney Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Salvin Argueta Del Cid v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1052
Petitioner:
SALVIN JAVIER ARGUETA DEL CID
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Thompson et al v. Del Cid
as 0:2021cv03973
Plaintiff:
Janet C. Thompson
Defendant:
Lola I. Schappell and Valerie Lee Del Cid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
del Cid Diaz v. Custom Framing Enterprise LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kevin del Cid Diaz
Defendant:
Custom Framing Enterprise LLC and Marian Szwanczar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alvaro Arias Del Cid v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1881
Petitioner:
ALVARO JOSUE ARIAS DEL CID
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Del Cid v. Danny's Cleaning Service, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01971
Plaintiff:
jaqueline del cid
Defendant:
Danny's Cleaning Service, LLC, DB Cleaning Services, Inc., Daniela Baccete and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
