Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Samuel Sigoloff v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 23-2137
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAMUEL SIGOLOFF
Defendant / Appellee: LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, Individually and in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Army, ANTHONY R. HALE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Commanding General of Fort Huachuca and others
South Carolina, State of v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 21-1085
Defendant / Appellant: MAJOR GENERAL DIANA M. HOLLAND, in her official capacity as Commanding General, South Atlantic Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SAVANNAH DISTRICT, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: SAVANNAH RIVERKEEPER
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, AUGUSTA, GEORGIA, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL and others
Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 20-2042
Petitioner: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILD VIRGINIA, APPALACHIAN VOICES and others
Respondent: COLONEL PATRICK V. KINSMAN, in his official capacity as District Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A. SPELLMON, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, WILLIAM T. WALKER, in his official capacity as Chief, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District and others
Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2039
Petitioner: INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, APPALACHIAN VOICES and others
Respondent: COLONEL JASON A. EVERS, in his official capacity as District Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District, LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A. SPELLMON, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
City of New York v. DOD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1699
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Navy, DR. MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF NEW YORK and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Toby Mackall v. US Department Of Defense We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2435
Plaintiff - Appellant: TOBY ROBERTO MACKALL
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CLARK W. LEMASTERS, JR., Major General, U.S. Army, TACOM Commanding General, TIMOTHY D. LUEDECKING, Colonel, U.S. Army, Military Assistant, OUSD ATL and others
EarthReports v. United States Army Corps of En
as 11-2178
Plaintiff - Appellant: EARTHREPORTS, d/b/a Patuxent Riverkeeper
Plaintiff: PATUXENT RIVERKEEPER
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS, a/k/a USACE, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, a/k/a Van, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee: WOODMORE TOWNE CENTRE LLC
Friends of Back Bay et al v. US Army Corps of Eng et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1184
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRIENDS OF BACK BAY and BACK BAY RESTORATION FOUNDATION, LTD
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of The Army, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?