Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alston v. Creditors Interchange, Inc.
as 8:2011cv02292
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alston
Defendant:
Creditors Interchange, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Daley v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
as 3:2010cv00864
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Daley
Defendant:
Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith et al v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
as 5:2010cv00420
Plaintiff:
Miguel Smith and Carla Smith
Defendant:
Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kozak
as 1:2009cv02678
Plaintiff:
Rachel Kozak
Defendant:
Creditors Interchange Receivable Managemant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robinson et al v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00295
Plaintiff:
Neal J. Robinson and Suzanne R. Robinson
Defendant:
Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC, Molly Long and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DeCamps et al v. Creditors Interchange Agency LLC et al
as 4:2009cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jared M DeCamps and Janna M DeCamps
Defendant:
Creditors Interchange Agency LLC, Creditors Interchange Receivable Management LLC, Roxanne Santos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
