Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Chaney v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv03319
Petitioner:
Keith Chaney
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade v. Foster
as 1:2017cv01371
Plaintiff:
Brett Wade
Defendant:
Erin Chaney Foster
Counter_claimant:
Erin Chaney Foster
Counter_defendant:
Erin Chaney Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walter v. Briggs Chaney Plaza, LLC
as 8:2015cv00879
Plaintiff:
Deann Walter
Defendant:
Briggs Chaney Plaza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 8:2014cv04008
Plaintiff:
Jack B. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Prince George's County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Chaney et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01523
Plaintiff:
Bruce Chaney and Sharon Chaney
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CCA Financial, LLC v. Cambridge Housing Authority, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv03724
Plaintiff:
CCA Financial, LLC
Defendant:
Cambridge Housing Authority, LLC and James B. Chaney, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Thomas v. Allgood et al
as 8:2010cv03355
Plaintiff:
Titus Thomas
Defendant:
Allgood, Vine, Janel Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Likin et al
as 8:2010cv02622
Plaintiff:
Titus Thomas
Defendant:
R. Likin, Ziler, E. Layton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Huff et al
as 8:2010cv02269
Plaintiff:
Titus Thomas
Defendant:
R. Huff, R. Likin, R. Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv02195
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
