Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Smith v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2023cv04820
Petitioner:
Robert Davis Smith, Jr and Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kathleen Borland et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04636
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Borland, James Borland, Mark Ernstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barrett et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2021cv03882
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Barrett, Ashley Boulafentis, Zack Burtt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrison v. Vandermosten et al
as 4:2019cv01926
Plaintiff:
Billy D. Morrison and Billy Devar Morrison
Defendant:
Laurn Miller, G. Watt, David Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv03582
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Chisholm et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03383
Plaintiff:
Anthony Espinosa, Renate Lawson, Jo Ann Smith and others
Defendant:
Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., Kidde PLC, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. County of Greenville et al
as 6:2018cv01744
Plaintiff:
Garrin David Smith
Defendant:
County of Greenville and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Porter et al
as 6:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Garrin David Smith
Defendant:
D Porter, W Mann, J F Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. USA
as 4:2015cv05042
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joshua David Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. The State
as 6:2015cv02866
Plaintiff:
Robert David Smith, Jr
Defendant:
The State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
