Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Vaughter v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughter
Defendant:
Lt. R. Vaughn, Sgt. Andrews, Ofc. Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. M. Perry
as 21-7701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
M. PERRY, Intel Officer, L. DARBY, Intel Officer, M. NELSON, Intel Officer and others
Arkalgud Lakshminarasimha v. Duke Energy Progress
as 21-2249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARKALGUD N. LAKSHMINARASIMHA
Defendant / Appellee:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, GE, EPRI and others
David Meyers v. Harvey Spencer
as 21-7470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HARVEY SPENCER, Chief Secretary, MARCUS ELAM, VADOC Eastern Regional Administrator, G. HOLLOWAY, VADOC Eastern Regional Ombudsman and others
David Meyers v. A. Robinson
as 21-6688
Defendant / Appellee:
WAUMMADI, MICHELLE WALKER, Counselor, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Director of Action Alliance Commonwealth of VAPREA
as 21-6672
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER BROWN, SXI Intel Officer, PEODE, SX1 Physician, MAJOR RUFFIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Mosley
as 21-6670
Defendant / Appellee:
GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR MOSLEY, SERGEANT DIAL, MS. DARBY, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6674
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN IVAN GILMORE, Chief Warden, COUNSELOR R. BRITT, ANGELA WETHINGTON, Operations Manager/PREA Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Warden I. Hamilton
as 21-6660
Defendant / Appellee:
TONYA FOREMAN, DR. ULEP, TINYA FOREMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Meyers v. Perry et al
as 2:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Officer Mr. Lockhart, Ofc. Ms. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
