Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Tucker v. VADOC et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Taiveon Tucker
Defendant:
VADOC, Dunlevy, Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Krug v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Krug
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Ms. Beth Cabell, Mr. Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monzon v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
Erick Brown, Joshua M. Branch, Angela D. Wethington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vernon Belcher, Jr. v. Sussex I State Prison
as 23-6986
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VERNON E. BELCHER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSSEX I STATE PRISON, OFFICER B. BAINS, Corrections Officer, OFFICER L. ANSAH, Corrections Officer and others
Dashawn Grasty v. L. Mabrey
as 23-6901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DASHAWN GRASTY
Defendant / Appellee:
L. MABREY, IVAN GILMORE, Z.S. DUNLEVY and others
Kinard v. Dunlevy
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jordan Joseph Kinard
Defendant:
Sergeant Mr. Dunlevy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venable v. Dunlevy et al
as 3:2022cv00661
Plaintiff:
Demetric Venable
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Dunlevy and Tony M. Darden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 22-7052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, VADOC Director, KIJAKAZI KILOLO, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, ANDREW SAUL and others
Meyers v. Petersburg Circuit Court et al
as 2:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Petersburg Circuit Court, Martin Bryant, Sean Vancampen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Clarke et al
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Kilolo Kilajazi, Andrew Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
