Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Amy Bryant v. Joshua Stein
as 24-1617
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, PHD MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, M.D., KODY H. KINSLEY, in his official capacity as the North Carolina Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF FLORIDA, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL and others
Amy Bryant v. William Brawley
as 24-1600
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, KODY H. KINSLEY, in his official capacity as the North Carolina Secretary of Health and Human Services, PHD MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, M.D. and others
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Amicus Curiae:
FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Amy Bryant v. Timothy Moore
as 24-1576
Defendant:
PHD, FNP-BC SHARONA Y. JOHNSON, WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, JD JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board and others
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, NC VALUES INSTITUTE, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL and others
Tamer Mahmoud v. Monifa McKnight
as 23-1890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMER MAHMOUD, ENAS BARAKAT, JEFF ROMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MONIFA B. MCKNIGHT, SHEBRA L. EVANS, LYNNE HARRIS and others
Amicus Curiae:
DOUGLAS LAYCOCK, Professor, HELEN M. ALVARE, Professor, THOMAS C. BERG, Professor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2056
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
