Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jackson v. Grafton et al
as 1:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Reno Jackson
Defendant:
Daniel T. Grafton and Kelli Grafton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Grafton v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv04304
Plaintiff:
April Grafton
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hershman v. City of Grafton et al
as 1:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
George R. Hershman
Defendant:
City of Grafton and David T. Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grafton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15776
Plaintiff:
Barbara Grafton and Keith Grafton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hershman v. City of Grafton et al
as 1:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
George R. Hershman
Defendant:
City of Grafton and David T. Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mumaw et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Lynsey Mumaw and Samantha K. West
Defendant:
John Casey Jones , Grafton Fire Department and City of Grafton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Burton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02866
Plaintiff:
Lillian Burton and Grafton Burton, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Silvester v. Davis et al
as 1:2012cv00136
Plaintiff:
Anthony Silvester, III
Defendant:
James I. Davis, Keith Haddix, The City of Grafton, West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Housing Authority of the City of Grafton v. ARS, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00039
Plaintiff:
The Housing Authority of the City of Grafton
Defendant:
ARS, Inc. and Old Republic Surety Company
Counter_claimant:
ARS, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
The Housing Authority of the City of Grafton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE Office of Disciplinary Counsel
as 2:2011mc00060
Respondent:
John A. Grafton
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
