Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bowen v. Tyson Farms, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
David Bowen
Defendant:
Tyson Farms, Inc., The Hillshire Brands Company and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Avila et al v. Perdue Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03018
Defendant:
Koch Foods of Cumming LLC, Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc., Harrison Poultry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eusebio Avila and Ashley Scott
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Robinson et al v. Tysons Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02960
Defendant:
Koch Foods of Cumming LLC, MAR-JAC Poultry MS, LLC, Harrison Poultry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Glenda Robinson and Michael Dewayne Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02959
Defendant:
Koch Foods of Cumming LLC, MAR-JAC Poultry MS, LLC, Harrison Poultry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Glenda Robinson and Michael Dewayne Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Earnest v. Perdue Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02680
Defendant:
Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc., Harrison Poultry, Inc., Mar-Jac Poultry, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Emily Earnest
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Jien et al v. Perdue Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02521
Defendant:
Mar-Jac Holdings, Inc., Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc., Harrison Poultry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elaisa Clement, Kieo Jibidi and Judy Jien
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
United States of America v. North Georgia Electric Membership Corporation, et al
as 5:2016cv00820
Defendant:
North Georgia Electric Membership Corporation, Huntington Ingalls Inc., Harsco Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Southerland et al v. The Hillshire Brands Company
as 4:2014cv00165
Plaintiff:
Roger Southerland and Gwendolyn Dozier
Defendant:
The Hillshire Brands Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
