Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Asencio v. Crawford, et al.
as 1:2020cv00972
Respondent:
Thomas Homan, Kevin McAllen, Ford Hott and others
Petitioner:
Leonardo Asencio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Berhanu v. Crawford et al
as 3:2020cv00672
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, Donald Vitteso, Thomas Homan and others
Petitioner:
Henock Tebese Berhanu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lazaro v. Crawford et al
as 2:2020cv00198
Respondent:
Marlen Diniero, Thomas Homan, Ford Hatt and others
Petitioner:
Gonzales Lameran Lazaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muhammad v. Homan et al
as 2:2020cv00757
Defendant:
Hannah Marsh, Bethany Homan and North Charleston Police Department
Plaintiff:
Ameen A. Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Desdin v. Crawford et al
as 1:2019cv01597
Respondent:
Ronald Vitiello, Tomas Homan, Fod Hott and others
Petitioner:
Miquel A. Desdin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Desdin v. Crawford et al
as 1:2019cv01523
Respondent:
Ronald Vitiello, Tomas Homan, Fod Hott and others
Petitioner:
Miguel A. Desdin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jose Obando-Segura v. William Barr
as 19-7736
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS HOMAN, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHARLES LEE, Assistant Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement, CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE ANDRES OBANDO-SEGURA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00863
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castillo-Fornaris v. Crawford et al
as 3:2019cv00862
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, Kevin McAlleenan, Fod Hott and others
Petitioner:
Miguel Castillo-Fornaris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Girmachew v. Crawford et al
as 3:2019cv00593
Respondent:
Rhomas Homan, Matthew Albence, Kevin Mcalleenan and others
Petitioner:
Tewdors Girmachew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
