Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vanderhorst et al v. City of Georgetown et al
as 2:2023cv03594
Plaintiff:
Tony Vanderhorst, Evelyn McCray and Willie Singleton
Defendant:
City of Georgetown, Robert Durant Cox, Ryan J. Call and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walter Edward Hayden et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01746
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Hayden, John Lawrence Kemp, Gregory David Kaser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Hume et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv00381
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hume and Simone Hume
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Singleton v. Georgetown, City of et al
as 2:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Ricky Martin, Sheldon A Butts, Rudolph A Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ameduri v. Reichental et al
as 0:2016cv02995
Defendant:
Reichental, Abraham N. Reichental, Damon J. Gregoire and others
Plaintiff:
Ameduri and Phillip Ameduri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Howes v. Reichental et al
as 0:2016cv02810
Plaintiff:
Dave Howes
Defendant:
Abraham N. Reichental, Damon J. Gregoire, Charles W. Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster v. Reichental et al
as 0:2016cv01016
Plaintiff:
Mark Foster
Defendant:
Abraham Reichental, Damon Gregoire, Charles Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nally v. Reichental et al
as 0:2015cv03756
Plaintiff:
James Nally
Defendant:
Abraham N. Reichental, Charles W. Hull, Daniel S. Van Riper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riches v. Hume et al
as 6:2008cv01249
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Brit Hume, Mary Matalin and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
