Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wiwel, et al v. IBM Medical and Dental Benefit Plans for Regular Full-Time and Part-Time Employees, et al
as 5:2015cv00504
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wiwel , Sharon Wiwel and E.W., a minor by and through her parents Timothy and Sharon Wiwel
Defendant:
IBM Medical and Dental Benefit Plans for Regular Full-Time and Part-Time Employees and United Behavioral Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Wenk Personal Property, Specifically Described as et al
as 7:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Wenk Personal Property, Specifically Described as, One HP Pavilion Personal Computer, One Samsung Hard Drive and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00029
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP et al
as 3:2007cv00491
Plaintiff:
Pauline Rowl
Defendant:
Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP, Kirschbaum Nanney Keenan & Griffin PA, Monogram Credit Card Bank of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
