Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pagan et al v. Faneuil, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Pagan and Lilyann Davila
Defendant:
Faneuil, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Credit Repair Organization Act
Sweet et al v. Advance Stores Company, Incorporated et al
as 7:2021cv00549
Plaintiff:
Deniece Pagans, Janet Sweet, Safi M. Riaz and others
Defendant:
Advance Stores Company, Incorporated, The Retirement Committee of Advance Auto Parts, Inc. 401(k) Plan, The Board of Directors Of Advance Stores Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
The Travelers Indemnity Company Of Connecticut v. Spivey Rentals, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00562
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Indemnity Company Of Connecticut
Defendant:
Spivey Rentals, Inc., Michelle Pagan and Erick Duane Kaba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Pagans v. Saul
as 7:2019cv00505
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Pagans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
De Los Santos-Pagan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00465
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Miguelina De Los Santos-Pagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pagan v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 2:2018cv00494
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison
Plaintiff:
Lance Richardson Pagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00429
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pagan v. United States District
as 7:2012cv00170
Petitioner:
Alberto Pagan
Respondent:
United States District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pagan v. Kelly
as 1:2011cv01037
Petitioner:
Hector Luis Pagan
Respondent:
Loretir K. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
