Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Rose v. Stirling
as 0:2023cv05261
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Defendant:
Brian Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Nealson v. Maynard et al
as 7:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Mr. Maynard, Mr. Ball, Mr. Cassey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. McCormick Correctional Institution
as 0:2023cv01532
Petitioner:
James R. Rose
Respondent:
McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rose v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough L.L.P.
as 2:2023cv01264
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Defendant:
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rose v. Palmer
as 0:2023cv01022
Petitioner:
James R. Rose
Respondent:
Warden Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rose v. Warden
as 0:2022cv02050
Petitioner:
James R. Rose
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Rose v. Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution
as 21-6938
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, MCCORMICK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. ROSE
James Rose v. Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution
as 21-6908
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, MCCORMICK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. ROSE
James Rose v. Bryan Sterling
as 21-6331
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYAN STERLING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. ROSE
Rose v. South Carolina
as 0:2020cv02921
Defendant:
McCormick Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Respondent:
Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution and South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.