Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Sharpe v. Bircher
as 7:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Sharpe
Defendant:
John C. Bircher, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sharpe v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01673
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Sharpe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Sharpe v. Spark et al
as 7:2023cv01348
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Sharpe
Defendant:
Peter J. Spark, Mark Leon Eastham and Daniel Matthew Shoaf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Duster et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01242
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Duster, Gary Michael Cummings, John Page Cunningham and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Handy Jr v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv00033
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Handy, Jr
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemours Company, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Heyer v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
as 19-7027
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SARA M. REVELL, THOMAS R. KANE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons, IKE EICHENLAUB, in his official capacity as Regional Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons Mid-Atlantic Region and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PAUL BOYD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS HEYER
BRINDLE JR v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PAUL BRINDLE JR
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Robert Paul v. ImpactOffice LLC
as 17-1810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT PAUL
Defendant - Appellee:
IMPACTOFFICE LLC, A Maryland Limited Liability Company
Robert Paul v. ImpactOffice LLC
as 17-1759
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT PAUL
Defendant - Appellant:
IMPACTOFFICE LLC, A Maryland Limited Liability Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
