Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Paul Chenevert v. B. L. Kanode
as 23-7056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL ANTHONY CHENEVERT
Defendant / Appellee:
B. L. KANODE, Warden, A. WHITE, Asst. Warden, LT. COLNA and others
Defendant:
OFFICER POTTER, JOHN DOE(S), Watch Commander at RNCC and JOHN/JANE DOE, Correctional Officers at RNCC
Cooper v. Barr et al
as 7:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Israel Ray Cooper
Defendant:
C/O Barr, Sgt. Evans, Lt. Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. River North Correctional Center et al
as 7:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Vincent A. Hardy, Jr.
Defendant:
River North Correctional Center, Stoyer, Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chenevert v. Kanode et al
as 7:2021cv00562
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony Chenevert
Defendant:
B.L. Kanode, A. White, Lt. Colna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Evans et al
as 1:2021cv00945
Plaintiff:
Damion T. Neal
Defendant:
Sgt Evans and N. Scarper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monzon v. Evans et al
as 7:2021cv00242
Defendant:
Sgt. Evans, Melissa D. Sowers, Tammy Barbetto and others
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. Capt. Bhagavaith et al
as 3:2019cv00562
Defendant:
Sgt. Evans, C. O'Brien, Sgt. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. The Dept. of Corrections (D.O.C.) Virginia et al
as 2:2019cv00132
Defendant:
Sgt. Evans, Sgt. Stinette and The Dept. of Corrections (D.O.C.) Virginia
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lamar Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Evans
as 7:2019cv00093
Plaintiff:
Milton Antoine Brown and Sultan Imanuel El-Bey
Defendant:
Sgt. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Bacon v. Hill, et al.
as 1:2018cv00237
Plaintiff:
Adrian Nathaniel Bacon
Defendant:
Lt. Hill, C/O Hill, Sgt. Land and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
