Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linzie Andrew Humes v. Patricia McCoy et al
as 7:2021cv00373
Plaintiff:
Linzie Andrew Humes
Defendant:
E. Kelly, Major Johnny Billiter, Rasnake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Stump v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00232
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Latoya Stump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Stump v. Upstaging, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00789
Defendant:
Julie R. Bell and Upstaging, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jimmy G. Stump, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wasim Ata Bey ex rel Erick Sealey v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
Wasim Ata Bey ex rel Erick Sealey
Defendant:
J.W. Mitchell, David A. Patrick, Thomas Chabot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stump v. Commonwealth Of Virginia
as 7:2012cv00300
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Lee Stump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00185
Defendant:
K. Austin, Sgt. Baily, Mrs. Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 7:2011cv00028
Defendant:
Big Stone Gap Police Department, Commonwealth Of Virginia, Dept. of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services and others
Plaintiff:
Don W. McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
